2

I am currently using an Arduino Uno and creating an LCD simulator that works by sending LCD data through the hardware UART (serial interface). This LCD data is very short in length; in this case, it's 2 bytes. The LCD simulator has already been made, and it is capable of detecting these LCD packets on the serial port and using them to control the simulated LCD.

However, I don't want to disturb the other traffic passing through the serial port; in this case, it's just text. The problem is that most serial monitors are able to pick up the LCD packets, which aren't supposed to be printed out because they appear as gibberish.

For now, I'm prefixing these short LCD packets with two magic numbers for it to be detectable by the LCD simulator alongside non-LCD traffic, and perhaps removable by a modified serial monitor.

I thought about using ASCII control characters to inform regular terminals that following data must not be printed, but there does not seem to be a specific control character to "hide" text/data; the closest thing there is is the BS character. All other control characters seem to give an inconsistent result among terminals - i.e. ESC doesn't actually hide text with the Windows console host, but it does with mintty.

My goal is to not have to integrate my own serial monitor and force others to use it if there is traffic present that can only be read by the LCD simulator. I want to allow others to use their own terminals and serial monitors to exchange textual data with the Arduino while seamlessly having LCD packets being sent invisibly and "under the hood."

Is this possible? Can I mix different types of data across the same serial port? If not, what are my options, or am I essentially forced to "reinvent the wheel" by making my own protocol that can mix the two types of traffic?

| improve this question | |
  • If it's only two bytes, the cost of encoding the data in hex or something like that so it won't seriously distort a serial monitor should not be too great. But if you want to completely filter it out, yes, you will probably need your own client - theoretically you could follow it with a few backspaces or an ANSI escape sequence having similar effect, and that will work on some terminal emulators or configurations thereof, but it will only make an even bigger mess with other configurations. – Chris Stratton Sep 18 '16 at 5:08
1

The idea that sundry terminal programs can cleanly deal with binary data intended for your LCD simulator doesn't seem realistic. Instead, look for a method to suppress the binary data when the Arduino isn't talking to an LCD simulator.

For example, during startup the Arduino could send some fixed text and a number to the host, and if the simulator is running, it would reply to the Arduino with some other fixed text and the 9's complement of the number. If the Arduino doesn't get such a reply within a couple of seconds, it turns off LCD-simulation data transmission.

| improve this answer | |
1

If I were to do something like this on Linux, I would probably have the LCD simulator sit between the Arduino and the serial monitor, like this:

                    +---------------------------------------------------+
                    |                    host computer                  |
+-------------+     | +-------------------+         +-----------------+ |
|             |     | |                   |         |                 | |
| Arduino  UART-----tty  LCD simulator    ptmx----pts  Serial monitor | |
|             |     | |                   |         |                 | |
+-------------+     | +-------------------+         +-----------------+ |
                    +---------------------------------------------------+

For this, you have to:

  1. open the serial port connected to the Arduino (“tty” on the figure)
  2. create a pair of pseudo-terminals (ptmx/pts)
  3. open the master side of the pair (ptmx)
  4. ask the user to open the slave side (pts) with his serial monitor
  5. forward all traffic but the LCD control messages between the Arduino and the pseudo-terminal.

I don't know how this works on MacOS, but since the whole pseudo-terminal concept is a standard Unix feature, I would expect it to work in a similar way on MacOS and Linux. But then I have no idea how hard it would be to port this to Windows.

| improve this answer | |
  • From README.md at github ... LCDViewer, the Arduino links a LiquidCrystal library that substitutes for the usual LiquidCrystal library. That library sends 4 bytes per LCD op, which a python program on host uses to control an on-screen simulated display. Ie, there isn't a separate 'LCD simulator' piece of hardware. – James Waldby - jwpat7 Sep 18 '16 at 18:03
  • @jwpat7: I know. I did read that README before answering. The LCD simulator is not a piece of hardware, it's a piece of software. – Edgar Bonet Sep 18 '16 at 18:25
  • Ok - so in your diagram, the left box is Arduino hardware, and the other two boxes are host processes that communicate via pseudo-terminal or pipe? Probably an elegant solution. – James Waldby - jwpat7 Sep 18 '16 at 18:39
  • @jwpat7: Yes, via a pseudo-terminal rather than a pipe: a pseudo-terminal is essentially a virtual serial port, so it should play well with a serial monitor. – Edgar Bonet Sep 18 '16 at 19:52
0

I would simply send the data as ASCII, in the form of hex bytes. It wil make your two bytes become four, plus the two "leader" characters to uniquely identify them becomes six. This minor overhead can probably be absorbed.

If you have much more binary (non-ASCII) data, you could look at using a different encoding format such as Base64. This only has a 2 character overhead for every 6 bytes of binary data.

You don't mention what data rate you use, either in baud rate or "packets per second", but if you're reading it on a serial monitor it can't be very much.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.