Timeline for Using an Arduino as the processor for a computer-mouse-like speed detector
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2016 at 22:01 | comment | added | Lui | Thanks Jogco, I wasn't totally sure about feasibility. I guess for speed accuracy there is some relationship with the field of view and the speed at which each image is processed. I have been looking for a significantly lower resolution camera, but am unable to find it. I wonder if I would be able to use a small (~10x10?) array of photoresistors and multiplex through them. This would need some form of light source to go with it, too. | |
| Jan 12, 2016 at 11:10 | history | edited | jogco | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 12 characters in body
|
| Jan 12, 2016 at 11:07 | comment | added | jogco | Sure, then we can straighten out that question mark, and move it: !(need RTC). I was just throwing up possible areas to investigate. | |
| Jan 12, 2016 at 10:43 | comment | added | frarugi87 | I totally agreed with this until you wrote that "need RTC" sentence.. An RTC? Why? RTCs are good at keeping time when the device is off, not to measure small time gaps (usually they have a 1s granularity). Crystals' precision is really enough for this project. What really lacks is the computational power to analyse the image in few milliseconds | |
| Jan 12, 2016 at 9:15 | history | answered | jogco | CC BY-SA 3.0 |