Timeline for Displaying binary to LEDs
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2015 at 21:50 | comment | added | Jamerack | I'll definitely do that next time and save myself the trouble lol | |
| Dec 13, 2015 at 21:21 | comment | added | Madivad | It is amazing what the tired mind does sometimes. I find I am often trying to finish "one thing" before calling it a night, and it can have me stumped for hours! At some point, I give up and call it quits. The next morning, refreshed, you take one look at it and see something that you simply can't believe you missed the night before, and in 30 seconds you've fixed the previous 4+ hours of angst. You think to yourself, the next time this happens, I'll just go to bed. But the next time it happens, you spend another night on one problem, that takes another 30 secs to fix the next day, again! lol | |
| Dec 13, 2015 at 14:04 | vote | accept | Jamerack | ||
| Dec 13, 2015 at 14:00 | comment | added | Jamerack | Thanks! I actually originally didn't have the index mistake, but when I was looking back over it last night my tired mind though I had made a mistake where there wasn't one and changed it. | |
| Dec 13, 2015 at 10:51 | comment | added | Madivad |
I was going to rewrite your code, but you've given it a pretty good stab anyway, so take my info above on board and give it another shot. If you have any problems post your new code in an update to the question and we can help you work on it further. If you're under the pump and just want an answer, let us know and I or someone else can give you how we'd do it, but there's nothing better to learning than doing it yourself. It will stick in your head a lot better after giving it another go yourself. You won't make mistakes like that index again (or not in that way, anyway)
|
|
| Dec 13, 2015 at 10:41 | history | answered | Madivad | CC BY-SA 3.0 |