Timeline for Detect a non-human moving object
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2018 at 8:53 | answer | added | khaled Mohamed | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 22, 2016 at 0:29 | history | edited | Lipika | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 59 characters in body
|
| Dec 15, 2015 at 6:30 | answer | added | Vinod | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 7, 2015 at 15:22 | answer | added | Niels | timeline score: 0 | |
| Sep 7, 2015 at 6:29 | answer | added | John | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 7, 2015 at 11:46 | answer | added | JRobert | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 8, 2015 at 6:12 | comment | added | Nick Gammon♦ | Why the restriction on non-human, exactly? Is it OK if you back into a human? If so, why? If you want something that senses the difference between a moving inanimate object (like a car) and a human, then surely such a detection system would also detect things like dogs and cats. Unless you are going to Google for a "human detector" it seems to me that any sort of distance detector would do. Surely you don't want to reverse into anything, alive or not. | |
| Jul 7, 2015 at 23:26 | answer | added | Majenko | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jul 7, 2015 at 22:52 | comment | added | CharlieHanson | Do you mean that you're trying to detect a moving car, or are YOU the moving object and you're trying to detect a static object that just happens to be a car? If it's the former, would a hot engine not trigger a PIR sensor? | |
| Jul 7, 2015 at 22:11 | review | First posts | |||
| Jul 8, 2015 at 9:06 | |||||
| Jul 7, 2015 at 22:07 | history | asked | Lipika | CC BY-SA 3.0 |